The Husky Gentleman

Booze Lobby Targets Green Day's Billie Joe Armstrong

The American Beverage Institute, lobbying against legislation that would make in-car breathalyzers mandatory, calls out Green Day frontman's DWI arrest in fight to preserve "moderate and responsible drinking." But is there really such a thing?
Green Day's Billy Joe Armstrong / Photo courtesy InterlockFacts.com
Green Day's Billy Joe Armstrong / Photo courtesy InterlockFacts.com

We're usually stoked to see Billie Joe Armstrong, a perennial Spin fave, gracing the pages of the New York Times. After all, his Green Day side project, Foxboro Hot Tubs, is tearing up the Southwest right now. But a mug shot of Billie Joe is utilized by a full-page ad in today's Times sponsored by a Capitol Hill lobbyist group for the alcohol industry. The message: Tougher laws for "hard-core drunk drivers" like Billie Joe, less restrictions for those partaking in "moderate and responsible drinking prior to driving." Billie Joe's DUI arrest in 2003 is certainly indefensible, but to juxtapose his mistakes with the legitimization of casual drunk driving is just, well, irresponsible.

First, a bit more detail about the ad (click here to view it). The headline reads, "Ignition Interlocks, A good idea for them," referring to mug shots of Armstrong, actor Kiefer Sutherland, and now-retired NFL quarterback Steve McNair, all of whom have DUI arrests on their records. Below the three mug shots, the ad reads, "A bad idea for us," and then displays photos of a bride and groom toasting at their wedding, some co-workers drinking after work, and some fellas having beers and burgers at a pub.

The ad copy goes on to say that the efforts of "activists" to put ignition interlocks (i.e. in-car breathalyzers) into every car in America "means the end of moderate and responsible drinking prior to driving: no more champagne toasts at weddings, no more wine with dinner, no more beer at ballgames."

Let's get one thing out of the way: Billie Joe driving around five years ago with a 0.18 blood alcohol content level isn't excusable. In fact, it's pretty awful, and he should (and probably does) thank some entity daily that he didn't slaughter anyone that night. But the line being drawn in this ad is ridiculous, particularly because the most abusive drinking I usually see occurs at, um, weddings and ballgames. When is the champagne toast the sole drinking opportunity at a wedding, and how frequently is the word "beer" used in its singular form at the stadium?

To be as succinct as possible, which scares you least: a one-time offender rock star like Billie Joe, herds of drunk college buddies driving home from weddings every weekend across the country, or a pissed off (and piss drunk) fan leaving the ballpark after a loss? They're all guilty, for sure, but in this argument, I'd take the craftsman of American Idiot before any other American idiots.

Comments

johannabartley

There are so many alcohol rehab programs and for a good reason too. Today a car passed a red light at a high speed and it passed me on the street at 10 centimeters. I felt the strong breeze pushing me. One minute later I heard a crash and that driver killed another one on the street. Of course, the speeding driver was drunk. He should be electrocuted.

mikemathew

Children suffering from fetal alcohol spectrum disorders can show signs of behavioural, intellectual and physical difficulties, including poor language and memory skills and attention problems.But lobby groups urged women who drank while pregnant not to "beat themselves up" if their child suffers from any disorders. ------------------------------------------ mikemathew DUI

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <!--pagebreak--> to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options